For a while now scientists have been trying to piece together what the body of an ancient species looked like. This species had an odd trait, spiral saw like teeth. Scientists debated back and forth whether the species, Helicoprion, was more closely related to a shark or other organisms. It was with the use of fossils of the Helicoprion and CT scans to finally discover which organism the Helicoprion was more closely related too.
Ends up it is not the shark as many scientists believed for a long time, but instead the modern chimaeras, or ratfish. The fossil record helped the scientists to discover more about this organism. It lived 270 million years ago, and was made up of mostly cartilage, not a substance that leaves behind particularly good fossils because it is easily crushed. However, one of the fossils found of the organism had preserved some of the cartilage, thus allowing the scientists who used the CT scans to better develope what the organism looked like way back then. Because they were able to go so in depth with the fossil they were able to figure out what organism was related to the Helicoprion. It does have similar traits to a shark, such as having cartilage and rather than bone, but it is the way the upper jaw is connected to the rest of the body that actually determines which current day organism it is more closely related too. In this case its upper jaw seemed to fuse to the brain tip, this characteristic is well known for being in chimareas and ratfish. The computers helped the scientists to focus in on these minute details that can mean serious differences.
We recently learned about fossil record in class, so it is very interesting to see it applied in the real world. If not for fossils the scientists would have been stuck, they would not have been able to discover much more about this organism. Clearly fossils are very important. Also, the computer technology played a big role in this discovery. This technology helped to build a 3D replica of the organism based off the fossil. The fact that we are now capable of doing this is amazing. It has allowed us to learn more about that specific organism, but also about the evolutionary history between the Helicoprion and the modern day ratfish/chimaeras.
The technology used in this event, at least to me seems to be very important. If we can use CT scans to form 3D images from this fossil, why wouldn't we be able to do this with other fossils? I could see this being very important in current day science. We are alwalys trying to discover things about the past in science, and with this technology it would become easier to picture how the world was millions of years ago.
For the most part this article seemed to be pure facts, no biases present. While reading this article I was very interested in it. What other organisms can we discover more about using this technology? We could easily expand what we know about certain adaptations and traits passed down from ancestors millions of years ago. It really does relate easily to what we are doing in class, which is a pleasant surprise because it makes everything a lot more interesting, it gives it a real world meaning, instead of just one of those things you learn in class. I am interested to see if the technology used on the Helicoprion fossils will continue to be used with other fossils we have.
C - R
ReplyDeleteR - R
A - R
I - R
S - A
Final Grade (You may remove this comment at your discretion): Reflective